FUE vs. FUT: Pros and Cons
This article is medically reviewed by Dr. Kuddusi Onay
When considering hair transplant options, two techniques generally come to the forefront: Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT).
Each method offers unique advantages and challenges, making them suitable for different candidates. This guide will delve into the specifics of both procedures to help you make an informed decision.
FUE and FUT Techniques
Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) involves removing individual hair follicles from the donor area (usually the back of the head) using a small punch tool. These follicles are then transplanted to the balding areas. Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT), on the other hand, involves removing a strip of skin with hair from the donor area, which is then dissected into individual follicular units and transplanted.
Both FUE and FUT techniques are highly effective and can produce natural-looking results. However, FUE is often favored for its ability to heal faster and leave less noticeable scarring, while FUT generally allows for a higher number of grafts to be transplanted in a single session, making it ideal for more extensive baldness.
Procedure Duration and Complexity
FUT procedures typically take less time than FUE since the extraction of follicles in FUE is more time-consuming. FUT might be the better option for those looking for quicker surgery times. However, the complexity of FUE offers a less invasive feeling overall, with no need for stitches.
Post-Operative Recovery and Care
Recovery from FUE is generally quicker, with patients often returning to normal activities in a couple of days. FUT recovery might take a bit longer due to the surgical nature of the strip extraction. Both procedures require careful post-operative care to ensure the best results and minimize the risk of complications.
Long-Term Effects and Scarring
FUE leaves multiple small, round scars that are typically less noticeable, especially in patients who like to wear their hair short. FUT leaves a single linear scar that can be concealed by longer hair. The choice between these methods often depends on the patient’s hairstyle preferences and their propensity for scarring.
Cost Comparison Between FUE and FUT
The cost of FUE can be higher than FUT due to the labor-intensive nature of the technique. The price will vary depending on the number of grafts needed and the clinic chosen. However, both procedures are considered long-term investments in your appearance and self-confidence.
The main difference between Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) lies in the way hair follicles are extracted from the donor area. In FUE, each follicular unit is individually taken directly from the scalp using a small punch tool. In contrast, FUT involves removing a strip of tissue from the scalp, from which individual follicular units are then extracted and transplanted.
Both FUE and FUT are performed under local anesthesia, which means pain during the procedure is minimal. However, FUE is generally considered less painful post-operatively because it does not require a large incision like FUT. The FUT method may involve more discomfort after the procedure due to the surgical removal of a strip of scalp.
The results from both FUE and FUT are permanent. The transplanted hair is genetically resistant to balding and should continue to grow for a lifetime. However, it’s important to note that hair loss might continue in other areas of your head, which may require additional treatments to maintain the overall appearance.
After an FUE transplant, you can cut your hair quite short because the scars left are tiny and scattered, making them hard to see even with very short hairstyles. In the case of FUT, the linear scar might be visible if the hair is cut very short, so it is generally recommended to keep your hair at a length that covers the scar effectively.